In Perspective: Microsoft Offering $44.6 Billion for Yahoo, But Exxon Made Over $40 Billion LAST YEAR

People were rightfully in awe when they heard the number that Microsoft was throwing out there to attempt to purchase Yahoo – $44.6 billion dollars. It certainly makes their huge-at-the-time deal last year to buy aQuantive seem fairly small at only $6 billion. The thought of $40+ billion changing hands is crazy. That’s why it’s kind of shocking to me that more people aren’t really up in arms when they hear Exxon Mobil made over $40 billion dollars in profit last year alone!

Yes, on the same day that was ruled by Microsoft/Yahoo news, Exxon announced they had set new records for both quarterly and yearly profits with $11.66 and $40.61 billion dollars respectively. They made just about $1,300 every second of 2007. This just a year after they set the previous record, $39.5 billion in 2006.

While I certainly respect a companies right to make money in a capitalist society, doesn’t $40.6 billion dollars in profits for one year seem just too much? Especially when gas prices are at the highest they’ve ever been at? When one of the largest companies in the world, News Corp. can’t afford to bid by themselves on Yahoo because their total value is only around $60 billion, a company raking in $40+ billion a year in pure profit just seems a bit extreme to me.

Just as the razorblade manufacturers can get away with charging whatever they want for razorblades (seriously how much do those cost to make?), oil companies can seemingly now afford to charge whatever they want for gasoline because people are not going to stop driving, even with gas approaching $4.00 a gallon in some parts of the country.

I understand several factors play into rising gas prices, but one of the major ones is that we don’t have enough oil refineries in the United States – and that will happen when despite there being millions of more drivers, we haven’t built a new refinery since 1976! Yes, it’s difficult and very costly to build ones nowadays that will appease the EPA, but when you’re making almost $12 billion dollars in profits a quarter – and when specifically you’re making $2.27 billion dollars in profit a quarter on your refining operations alone, I think you can afford to build some new ones.

I think it’s ridiculous that everyone gets all hyped up over a potential $40+ billion dollar deal to purchase the entirety of one of largest Internet companies out there, but no one really bats an eye when another company in a different industry is making that much in profit in a single year.

[photo: NARA/EPA via pingnews]

  • Tom
    "While I certainly respect a companies right to make money in a capitalist society..."


    I wish I had a dollar for every time someone complains about a company making excess profits. Oh wait, I do! - I own stock in ExxonMobile (among others).



    Our capitalist society gives all of us the right to drive much more economical cars AND own part of the very company that makes "excess profits"



    Capitalism is good. Limiting profits is not. This is not a moral issue, it is simply a fact of free market forces. A fact that our modern, government-indoctrinated entitlement society finds reprehensible. What is reprehensible to me is the very same people that think the Exxons of the world should be taxed for excess profits were not standing up for the government to help them out when they were LOSING billions of dollars a few years ago. Sheesh, at least be consistent with your support of the nanny state. Do you know how many people lost jobs with Exxon back then?



    I for one celebrate the Exxons of the world for creating such wealth for their shareholders, most of which are everyday, ordinary people.



    In closing, we are not entitled to big SUVs and cheap gas. Grow up and get over it. Oh, and by the way, yes, I do own a gas-guzzling SUV and truck, I just don't blame my high gas bills on Exxon.
  • jollyjo
    People may marvel at the $45 billion bid for Yahoo because they don't see "block and steel". It's the new reality that we need to wrap our heads around.


    Oil companies, on the other hand, are so research/exploration and capital intensive that I am sure any money they make is ever enough. Plus, it's boom time now but I am sure the "dry season" is coming!
  • Anonymous
    I almost fell for Tom's troll
    but luckily realized that

    what he was saying

    couldn't possibly be taken serioiusly.
  • Tom
    Thats because of your indoctrination.


    In an insane society, the sane appear insane.
  • Anonymous
    You can't compare ExxonMobil profit to the price for Yahoo. It's like writing an article about how Honda's are cheap when you compare them to the price of a new Rolls Royce.


    ExxonMobil makes tons of profit because they are so huge. where once there were many private oil companies now there is but a small handful. When you consolidate the total profits will go up.



    Would you call it outragous profits if 20 "billion dollar profit" companies merged and their resulting profit was suddenly $20B?



    Please use your brain and don't fall for the class warfare rhetoric about "record" profits.



    When you break it down, Google has a higher profit margin than ExxonMobile. Are you ready to go after them for record profits?
  • MG Siegler
    @anon - "Would you call it outragous profits if 20 "billion dollar profit" companies merged and their resulting profit was suddenly $20B?"


    yes, i would call that "outragous".
blog comments powered by Disqus