I fully agree with this editorial by Chris Ziegler calling for the Android OEMs to stop making so many phones each year. His intro:

The seed for this editorial was planted in my brain the day that the HTC Amaze 4G was released on T-Mobile 120 days after its predecessor, the Sensation 4G. It bears repeating: one hundred and twenty days. Even now, it makes my head spin.

If I had bought the Senstation 4G, the senstation I’d be feeling is something akin to a swift kick in the nuts.

Ziegler’s graphic in the post is pretty amazing when you consider that it’s Apple versus only HTC (and not even all HTC phones) — just one Android manufacturer. Factor the others in and it would look like a big gray mass — exactly what I see when I look at the Android phone market.

Ziegler does say there’s hope given that manufacturers like Samsung seem to be trying to establish routine updates and branding with their Galaxy S line. Of course, not mentioned is that this very line made headlines this morning for its inability to upgrade to the newest Android version — even though it was released just 18 months after the phone itself. 

Reading this piece over, another thought popped into my head: what if this once-a-year phone upgrade mentality pushes the carriers more towards one-year contracts? I could see someone like Sprint doing this to differentiate themselves and win customers. Of course, either the subsidy would have to be less upfront or the monthly contracts a bit more to sustain such a move. Still, I don’t think it’s so crazy.

  1. luxury-brands reblogged this from parislemon
  2. richiety reblogged this from parislemon
  3. macnatico reblogged this from parislemon
  4. charprincessa reblogged this from parislemon
  5. ahandsomestark reblogged this from parislemon
  6. parislemon posted this