Logo

parislemon

  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything

Andy Rubin Didn’t Delete “Open” Tweet, Twitter Lost It, Then Found It

the definition of open: “mkdir android ; cd android ; repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git ; repo sync ; make”

— Andy Rubin (@Arubin) October 19, 2010

A couple days ago I noted something odd: Andy Rubin’s first tweet, the one in which he gives the “definition of open” (for Android) was gone. Given that Rubin had just sent another tweet updating some numbers for Android, I assumed he (or someone) deleted it. And I wasn’t alone. Several Google employees rushed to Rubin’s defense, saying he likely deleted it due to the fact that the server which was hosting the code had been hacked over the summer and the code was subsequently moved, so Rubin’s tweet was no longer technically true.

But that explanation didn’t mesh with other things I was hearing as to why Rubin deleted it. Depending on who you talked to, there were a number of reasons, actually. And there’s a good reason for that — no one knew. And there’s a good reason no one knew: Rubin didn’t actually delete the tweet.

I reached out to Twitter about this possibility yesterday and they got back to me today confirming that it was a bug which deleted Rubin’s tweet. They fixed the bug, and the tweet has been restored. 

“During maintenance we encountered a bug. It caused us to drop a very small percentage of tweets. One of those was Andy’s. As soon as we realized this, we began work to restore them. We were able to recover them quickly and they’ve now been restored,” Twitter spokesperson Carolyn Penner tells me (from vacation no less).

She also notes this hasn’t happened before, so it was a tricky thing to figure out what was going on. So, stand down everyone. I apologize for getting everyone into a tizzy. Rubin’s open tweet still stands, even if it is technically incorrect now.

Update: I’m glad Rubin didn’t delete the tweet, because the debate rages on:

@parislemon being able to compile code is a very weak type of “open” cdixon.org/2010/04/25/the…

— chris dixon (@cdixon) December 29, 2011
    • #tech
    • #android
    • #andy rubin
    • #twitter
  • December 29, 2011
  • 17
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

17 Notes/ Hide

  1. kamalazmy liked this
  2. chasingtheflow liked this
  3. bananacasts liked this
  4. dvirreznik reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    Now that’s a very interesting turn...events here… Or maybe Twitter are simply scratching...
  5. srikard liked this
  6. josueuy liked this
  7. ajpreyes liked this
  8. rje7 liked this
  9. magerleagues liked this
  10. zaynehumphrey liked this
  11. matthewknell reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    “definition… Good...other alternatives before they make assumptions. Oh wait, that’s all...
  12. kalebaskew liked this
  13. amplexushoc liked this
  14. thecallus liked this
  15. merlin liked this
  16. jsenum liked this
  17. parislemon posted this
← Previous • Next →
Words by MG Siegler

Pages

  • About
  • Words
  • Vault
  • TC
  • Pando
  • Haikus

Elsewhere

  • @parislemon on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • parislemon on Vimeo
  • parislemon on Youtube
  • parislemon on Flickr
  • parislemon on Foursquare
  • parislemon on Gowalla
  • Google
  • Linkedin Profile
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

© 2012 MG Siegler. Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr