Great stuff by Kenny Suleimanagich. A few things of note. First:

At its peak, in 1996, Kodak was rated the fourth-most-valuable global brand. That year, the company had about two-thirds of the global photo market, annual revenues of $16 billion, and a market capitalization of $31 billion.

Today, Kodak trades around twelve cents a share. Its market cap is roughly $32 million. Yes, “million” with an “m”.

How will it be saved going forward?:

Among other things, Kodak CEO Antonio M. Perez is betting his commercial-printing business on high-volume customers who need a lot of ink, like product-packaging manufacturers. Even if this latest “pivot” is successful — and a lot of people think it’s a stretch — the company would be reduced to helping other people make the boxes used to ship the devices that will take the photographs of the future.


In the 1980s, one Kodak engineer, impressed by the then-new Macintosh II computer, began making proposals for Kodak to move into the digital realm. By the late 80s, the company had already made a four megapixel sensor — and did nothing with it. Why? As former Wired editor Chris Anderson puts it:

“Who could afford that?” Anderson fired back, unimpressed. “Macs were really expensive. Computing technology couldn’t have kept up until much later.”

Finally, as a reminder that some of the most transformative things start as pure gimmicks, consider the original George Eastman patent from the late 1800s:

In his original patent, he wrote that his improvements applied to “that class of photographic apparatus known as ‘detective cameras,’ ” — concealed and disguised devices, made possible by a new wave of miniaturization, that were used mostly for a lowbrow entertainment: snapping pictures of people unaware. Cameras equipped with single-use chemical plates were hidden in opera glasses, umbrellas, and other everyday objects, and sharing the surreptitious, random, and sometimes compromising photos that resulted became a popular fad. Eastman, in other words, was obsessively tinkering with what many people at the time would have considered a cheap novelty or a toy. Like Netflix in its early days, Kodak relied on the U.S. Postal Service: Customers sent their spent cameras to Rochester, where the film was removed, processed, and cut into frames; the resulting negatives and prints, along with the camera, reloaded with a fresh roll of film, were returned to the sender. Suddenly it was easy for anyone to take lots of pictures, and Eastman’s new business became a juggernaut almost overnight.

Everyone out there: keep tinkering.

  1. starksarcreactor reblogged this from parislemon
  2. igottahaveitnow reblogged this from parislemon
  3. njoytheride reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    Wow, this is awesome!
  4. roryhodgson reblogged this from parislemon
  5. taotsu2 reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    This just makes me sad!
  6. rcharleswhitejr reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    Great article!
  7. camerontwigden reblogged this from parislemon
  8. anamashrafali reblogged this from parislemon
  9. hfiguiere reblogged this from parislemon
  10. hackfwd reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    keep tinkering.
  11. dinofiocchi reblogged this from parislemon
  12. performsonwebcam reblogged this from parislemon
  13. superdaniel100 reblogged this from parislemon
  14. hannes reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    Very interesting… I’m wondering what Kodak could have done to adjust to the new technology. They did create digital...
  15. aothurston reblogged this from parislemon
  16. captenedi reblogged this from parislemon
  17. dennismfactory reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    New things don’t arrive or work all at once. They take time.
  18. virtuouspagan reblogged this from mgpolitis
  19. mgpolitis reblogged this from parislemon
  20. hctu reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    Fascinating origin of Eastman Kodak.