Whoa nelly. A few quick thoughts:

1) Inevitable.

2) This seems to take the drama out of the Microsoft CEO search. Nokia CEO Stephen Elop (a former Microsoftie) was already widely considered a leading contender — and now Microsoft has 7.2 billion more reasons to go with him. It also seems likely he would be a good candidate to carry out the “One Microsoft” initiative that Steve Ballmer has already put in place.

3) Fairly big demotion for Julie Larson-Green following her big promotion just last year. Unless… see: #2.

4) So why not just announce Elop as the new CEO now? Because the deal won’t close until Q1 2014. The biggest potential hiccup there is Nokia shareholders approving it.

5) From a pure dollar perspective, this seems to be quite the deal from what Microsoft was rumored to be considering paying just a few years ago.

6) Though it’s not nearly as good of a deal as Apple got to bring Steve Jobs back on board — $400 million in 1996 dollars.

7) Microsoft is taking on 32,000 new employees?!

8) It’s actually a pretty decent use of overseas cash, which would otherwise be taxed if repatriated.

9) Lighting the money on fire would have also saved it from being taxed.

  1. sycloalkane reblogged this from parislemon
  2. 9034725985 reblogged this from parislemon
  3. doktarotich reblogged this from parislemon
  4. case-custom reblogged this from parislemon
  5. madamedelaaldea reblogged this from parislemon
  6. nicomclane reblogged this from parislemon
  7. jeremygruszewski reblogged this from parislemon
  8. stormcontrol reblogged this from parislemon
  9. yaarik reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    Love this post by MG.
  10. dennismfactory reblogged this from parislemon
  11. ericbreese reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    "9) Lighting the money on fire would have also saved it from being taxed."
  12. bellatorilluminare reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    Why do I feel it’s like the Titanic deciding to tow the Herald of Free Enterprise…
  13. bookofdoomed reblogged this from parislemon and added:
    I like 8 and 9. Justifies paying $7.2B for a company they essentially control. Not completely, just partly. Still say...