iheartapple2:
Google Now for iOS Coming Soon?
Yep.
(Though I thought it was going to be a part of the Chrome iOS app. Or at least the Google Search app. But I’m all in favor of giving Now its own app — one of my favorite things out of Google in recent years.)
Update: It actually does look like it’s a part of the Google Search app in the video. And my understanding is that this is how it will work (coming up from the bottom). I still wouldn’t rule it out in Chrome down the road either.
Fairly powerful. 6 hours of battery life. $280.
This Chromebook makes more sense to me. Get it to $199, and I bet it gets really attractive to some folks.
Amazing — though things start to get weird around 2020.
[via @craigmod]
Mark Mahaney, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, speaking to Bloomberg. The crazy stat:
Based on his estimate, Priceline spent about $1.14 billion with Google in 2012, accounting for 2.6 percent of the search company’s ad revenue.
[via @bgurley]
An internal email to Motorola staffers leaked to Amir Efrati of WSJ.
…but if you can look past all that…
Google plans to layoff another 10 percent of employees — following the 20 percent reduction last year. The amount Google paid for Motorola seems to keep going up while the value they actually got seems to keep going down.
Kevin C. Tofel’s headline:
Finally! More devices using Android 4 than older versions
Which reads like Android 4 is finally on the majority of Android devices (well, the ones Google tracks through the Play Store). But that’s not actually true. It’s actually still only 45.1 percent of those devices which are using Android 4.0 or later. The rest — the majority — are still using Android 3.2 or less.
Clearly, Tofel meant that Android 4.0 is finally bigger than the next largest single version of Android, 2.3 (Gingerbread), at 44.2 percent. But not only is the wording misleading, it’s a silly comparison to make since Android 4.0+ includes two different versions of Android: Ice Cream Sandwich and Jelly Bean — neither of which are actually larger than Gingerbread.
(Nevermind for a second that Android 4.0 is over 15 months old and it’s fucking ridiculous that it has taken this long to get on just 45.1 percent of Android devices.)
But I’m okay giving Tofel a pass here considering that Google’s math doesn’t actually add up either. According to their own numbers, 45.1 percent of Android devices are using 4.0+ while 55.1 percent are using Android 3.2 and below. Yes, that’s 100.2 percent.
Google CFO Patrick Pichette, explaining that it will be a while before we see a great Motorola product.
Amir Efrati for WSJ:
But Mr. Rubin also said Samsung could become a threat if it gains more ground among mobile-device makers that use Android, the person said. Mr. Rubin said Google’s recent acquisition of Motorola Mobility, which makes Android-based smartphones and tablets, served as a kind of insurance policy against a manufacturer such as Samsung gaining too much power over Android, the person said. Google said Mr. Rubin wasn’t available for an interview.
I mean, how much more ground would Samsung have to gain? It absolutely dominates the Android landscape right now:
Samsung has increased its lead in Android-based smartphones, claiming 40.2% of the market in the fourth quarter, up from 38.7% a year earlier, according to IDC. Huawei Technologies Co. was in second place, with 6.6%, the same as a year earlier.
Basically everything in this article is the opposite of what Google has said publicly on the matter, but none of it should be surprising.
JR Raphael debunking a rumored product called the “Chromebook Pixel” for Computerworld on February 6:
But I’m a big believer in maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism about Internet-fueled “leaks” — and putting all the pieces together, this story is about as fishy as they get.
Actually, so fast, bucko.