Loading Post
Hang on a second while we grab that post for you.
Howdy, I'm MG Siegler. I’m a general partner at CrunchFund and a columnist for TechCrunch. This is where I collect things.
Loading tweets...

When I posted my Instagram comparison shots earlier, people bitched that it wasn’t the same scene, so it wasn’t a fair comparison.
Fair enough.
John Gruber took the *exact* same shot with an iPhone 4S and a Galaxy Nexus — using the same filter. The results once again speak for themselves.
While it looks like the Galaxy Nexus has shit on the lens. The reality is that it’s just a shittier lens.
Yes, I was being a bit of a dick earlier about Android users “polluting” the Instagram feed, but the reality is that the shots do look worse. No point sugar coating it. That’s not the users’ fault. It’s not Instagram’s fault. It’s the quality of the cameras. It’s the OEMs’ fault, and at least partially also Google’s fault (developers constantly bitch about the camera software/APIs baked into Android).
I’m happy that my friends with Android phones now get to experience the joy that is Instagram. I can think of at least a dozen people that I personally know well who wanted this app above all others. Now they have it. And they should.
The beauty of it being cross platform to me is situations like this. Because Instagram is becoming the ubiquitous camera app, it’s a great point of comparison. (It’s something we would have used Flickr for in the past, but no one seems to use Flickr anymore — at least not in the same way.) As a result, we can see how much better an iPhone camera is than a top Android camera. A lot.
This exposes something that is otherwise hard to expose: it’s either a lack of attention to detail amongst Android OEMs or a lack of caring. “Good enough” will never be the best.
That’s what I love about Apple and the iPhone. It’s a fucking beautiful camera. And it keeps getting better. They work really hard to make it so. The Android OEMs do not. Instagram exposes this. That is all.
First image I saw in my stream from Instagram for Android (Galaxy Nexus) versus the last Instagram I took (iPhone 4S).
Any questions?
Seriously, the Instagram team did a great job porting the world’s best photo app — 30 million users! — and, as a free app, Android is going to be massive for them. They’re going to hit 50 million in no time. But there’s one thing they have no control over: camera quality. Looking at my stream, it’s very obvious which pictures were taken with the iPhone and which were taken with Android devices. iPad 2 versus Android is harder to distinguish.
(Sorry Charles :) )
Great partnership and nice scoop by Austin Carr. Hipstamatic has always been a great app, but they’ve lacked the graph for sharing their photos as widely as possible with the best audience for them. That would be Instagram.
Interested to see how Instagram works as a platform for other photo apps — my hunch is really well. People always ask “what app did you take that picture with”, and now it can be baked right into the stream itself.
No clue if this 1.3 megapixel-equipped iPod nano is real or not (though it has a certain legit quality to it). But the idea of a super-stealth spy cam appeals to me. Embassies worldwide will be put on alert for the new iPod nano.
Tags tech apple ipod nano photography
Awesome. Free. Get it.
Tags tech instagram iphone photography
Anyone else always read this as “elb” when they were a kid? I thought it was some weird French Canadian way of abbreviating “Expos”.
I later heard it’s in fact an “M”, but that they wanted the red part to look like an “e” and the blue part a “b” so that the whole thing could be “Montreal expos baseball”.
It will always be “elb” to me.
Tags 514 Expos Montreal Necklace Photography sports baseball
Reblogged from Jodie Creations Source jodiecreations
I’m still trying to wrap my head around what the actual Lytro product (the camera) is and how it works without seeing it. But damn this sounds exciting.
A big idea to attempt to transform something that hasn’t been truly transformed since the 1800s.
But someone please tell me this doesn’t require Flash on the web. (The images on the site seem to.) Please.
Tags tech lytro photography
*Caveat being it has been the most popular camera for a long time. Flickr drastically undercounts pictures taken by phones — they estimate they accurately label about 2/3rds of all pictures with cameraphone “under-represented”.
The only thing that will dethrone the iPhone 4? The iPhone 5.
Also, what the hell is up with Android devices? Is it just because no single Android phone is as popular as the iPhone(s) that they are so low on these lists? Or is it something else?
Tags tech apple iphone 4 flickr photography
Notes